This is so silly and is a non-answer. Out of all the things that are queer coded in Wicked and Wicked for Good, it certainly isn't an undeveloped non-character like the Cowardly Lion. It was absolutely one of my least favorite parts of the movie that they did such a disservice to the character, which brings me to my original unanswered question.
It’s such a mess but also so compelling.
I think that if they let us spend any kind of real time with the charmed circle For Good would’ve been able to hit in ways it couldn’t in this moment
This is so silly and is a non-answer. Out of all the things that are queer coded in Wicked and Wicked for Good, it certainly isn't an undeveloped non-character like the Cowardly Lion. It was absolutely one of my least favorite parts of the movie that they did such a disservice to the character, which brings me to my original unanswered question.
it was really just a John Waters reference. a joke, even. not that serious
Ah. I wasn't taking it seriously other than literally not getting the reference. Thanks for enlightening me!
Why? Because Coleman Domingo is gay? Anyway. Was disappointed by the lack of Cowardly Lion story.
"Gay lion"?
GAY LION 🗣️🗣️🗣️
M'kay, why? Because Coleman Domingo is gay. I don't get it.
it's just understood.